David Deming wrote an interesting piece in the Washington Times. David is a geophysicist, an adjunct scholar with the National Center for Policy Analysis, and associate professor of Arts and Sciences at the University of Oklahoma. I would say he has some credibility in the area of global warming and science in general. I do realize he is not a Nobel Peace prize recipient who is also an acomplished film maker, author and former Vice President, but never the less, I think he may have some insight.
Acccording to Dr. Deming, the global mean temperature has increased 0.7 degrees Celsius. "This slight warming is not unusual, and lies well within the range of natural variation. Carbon dioxide continues to build in the atmosphere, but the mean planetary temperature hasn't increased significantly for nearly nine years. Antarctica is getting colder. Neither the intensity nor the frequency of hurricanes has increased. The 2007 season was the third-quietest since 1966. In 2006 not a single hurricane made landfall in the U.S."
I am not suggesting that this is evidence that anthropological global warming does not exist, but it does merit that true scientific investigations be conducted to answer these questions. The idea of "scientific" consensus on anything is dangerous. It is especially dangerous when skeptics are ostracized.
3 comments:
"It is especially dangerous when skeptics are ostracized."
Exactly, because the truth has no way of being known when healthy debate is not allowed; especially when something that has not been scientifically proven is being touted as fact.
Good scientist will always challenge conventional wisdom.
I would like a little more Global warming. Being from Toledo and you from Detroit, I am sure we have that in common. :~)
Post a Comment